tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8990057754240336385.post2586940547767886095..comments2024-02-27T09:18:36.160+01:00Comments on DeltaPatents Case Law blog: T 792/12 - The atmosphere of the oral proceedingsDeltaPatentshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07830354704918972593noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8990057754240336385.post-86408894645155673972016-11-29T18:12:31.922+01:002016-11-29T18:12:31.922+01:00To me, that is more of a human trait. Repeated arg...To me, that is more of a human trait. Repeated arguments can be seen in many places.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8990057754240336385.post-34707295552754582742016-11-28T10:04:43.639+01:002016-11-28T10:04:43.639+01:00It seems a little strange that the Minutes themsel...It seems a little strange that the Minutes themselves don't contain any information on what happened.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8990057754240336385.post-81777759322739754772016-11-28T09:37:02.577+01:002016-11-28T09:37:02.577+01:00Indeed!
We had that decision T 1647/15 on our bl...Indeed! <br /><br />We had that decision T 1647/15 on our blog <br /><a href="http://dp-patentlaw.blogspot.nl/2016/10/t-164715-eyes-of-objective-observer.html" rel="nofollow">last month</a>. Sander van Rijnswouhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08074604101159694993noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8990057754240336385.post-61796321547638524052016-11-26T22:15:20.164+01:002016-11-26T22:15:20.164+01:00Some representatives are indeed of the opinion tha...Some representatives are indeed of the opinion that by repeating their arguments, they become more pertinent. This is probably due to self suggestion, which should not be the case of a serious and competent representative. <br /><br />When reading Point 1 of the reasons, the proprietor's representative had ample opportunity to defend his case. Being frustrated when realising that he was not convincing does not allow to claim that the board is partial. The representative got what he deserved. <br /><br />In any case, the chairman of the Board stopped the representative in a more elegant way than the chairman of the opposition division in <br />T 1647/15. <br /><br />By the way R 113.3UPC provides that "the presiding judge can decide when the panel is sufficiently informed and thereby limit a party’s oral submissions". It is much more precise than Art 15(1)RPBA.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com