tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8990057754240336385.post4027445379700232573..comments2024-02-27T09:18:36.160+01:00Comments on DeltaPatents Case Law blog: T 2001/14 - No requests, application refusedDeltaPatentshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07830354704918972593noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8990057754240336385.post-1680147814220911732015-09-23T09:23:35.401+02:002015-09-23T09:23:35.401+02:00Tears come when one sees how the applicant explain...Tears come when one sees how the applicant explained that the new sets of claims were filed late for procedural economy, as this avoided the examining division having to deal with a large number of auxiliary requests.<br />It did however not withhold the applicant to file new requests after receiving the communication under R 71(3)! That those would be not be admitted under R 137(3) could not come as a surprise.<br />The applicant realised that the decision of not admission could not really be challenged, but in not taking this point which lead to the refusal of the application, he nearly missed admissibility of the appeal.Raoulnoreply@blogger.com