tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8990057754240336385.post6388032595145433959..comments2024-02-27T09:18:36.160+01:00Comments on DeltaPatents Case Law blog: T 1519/15 - Not so poisonous parentDeltaPatentshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07830354704918972593noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8990057754240336385.post-78072158577021636052017-09-01T10:28:20.081+02:002017-09-01T10:28:20.081+02:00I wonder that the difference is between a ‘genus’ ...I wonder that the difference is between a ‘genus’ and a 'generic "OR"-claim'. G 1/15 uses the latter phrase, but it seems to have the same meaning?Sander van Rijnswouhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08074604101159694993noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8990057754240336385.post-83589159231876443272017-09-01T09:32:49.876+02:002017-09-01T09:32:49.876+02:00In G 1/15, the enlarged board simply remembered th...In G 1/15, the enlarged board simply remembered that the raison d'être of the priority right is to avoid self-collision.<br /><br />The whole story about poisonous divisional applications should never have started. <br /><br />G 1/15 might not have solved all problems with respect to priority, but it is a big step forwardAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com