tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8990057754240336385.post9171996840500517526..comments2024-02-27T09:18:36.160+01:00Comments on DeltaPatents Case Law blog: T 985/11 Absence of proprietor leading to revocation? DeltaPatentshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07830354704918972593noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8990057754240336385.post-55567927491206842192016-05-23T08:46:20.912+02:002016-05-23T08:46:20.912+02:00If the worse comes to the worse, then there will b...If the worse comes to the worse, then there will be an OP for the adaptation of the description and even a further appeal. Where is then the overall economy of procedure?legal service providerhttp://www.clearwatersolicitors.co.uk/other-legal-services/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8990057754240336385.post-80869488163862946082016-05-16T10:58:17.794+02:002016-05-16T10:58:17.794+02:00The question at stake might not warrant a referral...The question at stake might not warrant a referral to the Enlarged Board, and even if the decision is legally correct, it remains nevertheless surprising. It goes clearly against a long line of established case law.<br />As far as the procedural economy is concerned, it might well be that the Board is satisfied that his own economy has duly been taken into account. <br />If the worse comes to the worse, then there will be an OP for the adaptation of the description and even a further appeal. Where is then the overall economy of procedure?<br />The need of certain Boards to attempt distinguishing themselves appears inextinguishable.....Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com