tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8990057754240336385.post4034857052868914834..comments2024-02-27T09:18:36.160+01:00Comments on DeltaPatents Case Law blog: T 2214/15 - Ordinary, not exceptionalDeltaPatentshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07830354704918972593noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8990057754240336385.post-22801377570990211052020-10-15T16:33:39.346+02:002020-10-15T16:33:39.346+02:00Hehe. I think people have tried that! It doesn'...Hehe. I think people have tried that! It doesn't end well though, I'm afraid. Sander van Rijnswouhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08074604101159694993noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8990057754240336385.post-68451305347728300632020-09-24T16:41:14.077+02:002020-09-24T16:41:14.077+02:00What we need is an "Auxiliary Request" g...What we need is an "Auxiliary Request" generator software that automatically generates every possible permutation of the words in the original application documents. Then we can file 10E80 or so auxiliary requests at the beginning of the proceedings and if there is an allowable request, there is a high chance it will be included in these permutations (as orginal disclsure at the EPO in pratice means "literal disclosure"). This should be perfectly in line with the drive of the EPO towards more efficient procedures. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com